I Audited 100 Pages Cited by ChatGPT — Here's What They All Have in Common
I pulled 100 pages ChatGPT actively cites across 12 niches and reverse-engineered the pattern: schema stack, word count, heading structure, entity density, and freshness. Here's the data.
- My role
- Sole researcher, analyst, and author
- Period
- Published 2026-05-12
- Last verified
- 2026-08-01
What I personally did
- Designed the research question and the sampling method.
- Collected and graded the data personally — no outsourced or scraped third-party dataset.
- Wrote every word of the published piece and maintain it after publication.
How the numbers were measured
- 600 buyer-intent prompts across 12 niches, each run three times in fresh sessions to control for response variance.
- Cited URLs logged, deduplicated to 100 unique pages, then crawled and graded against 14 fixed variables.
- Wikipedia, Reddit, and YouTube excluded so the findings stay actionable for commercial and editorial sites.
Evidence you can check
Prompt set and scoring rubric
The 14 scored variables and the niche breakdown are published inside the article itself.
Verification: Method is described in full in the article — the study is reproducible with your own prompt set.
Open sourceAnonymised dataset
URL-level schema profile and citation counts.
Verification: Released to newsletter subscribers; available on request for researchers who cite the source.
What this record does not prove
The sample skews B2B/SaaS and is English-only. Non-English and local-intent citation behaviour may differ.
Ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Gemini about this research?
24 citation-ready answers on AEO, GEO, schema, local SEO, and Bangladesh search — written in the 40–80 word format LLMs quote.
