First Jan. 6 Trial, of Guy Wesley Reffitt, Starts Monday
When the primary trial stemming from the assault on the Capitol opens on Monday, it would set the stage for prosecutors to do greater than merely lay out the main points of how the defendant, Guy Wesley Reffitt, sought to storm the constructing with a pistol at his hip.
For the primary time in a courtroom, they’ll current a broad portrait of the violent chaos that erupted that day and search to influence a jury that the pro-Trump mob that Mr. Reffitt is accused of becoming a member of struck on the coronary heart of American democracy by disrupting the transition of presidential energy.
The trial, which can happen in Federal District Court in Washington and start on Monday morning with jury choice, will not be the flashiest or most important of the handfuls of Capitol riot circumstances which can be scheduled to go to trial this 12 months.
But as a result of it’s the first to achieve a courtroom, it would more than likely set the tone for people who observe and function a form of proving floor for the fees prosecutors have filed in opposition to lots of of defendants. (More than 200 folks have already pleaded responsible in circumstances associated to the Capitol assault.)
At the center of Mr. Reffitt’s case is the accusation that the defendant, an oil trade employee with purported ties to a Texas militia, obstructed the work of Congress on Jan. 6, 2021, when a joint session of the House and the Senate met to certify the outcomes of the 2020 election. Prosecutors say he donned physique armor and a helmet mounted with a video digicam, and positioned himself at “the front of the pack” that charged the Capitol.
The obstruction cost — considered one of 5 counts lodged in opposition to him — has been utilized in lieu of different crimes like sedition or rebel in scores of Capitol riot circumstances to explain the disruption that occurred when the mob compelled lawmakers to flee.
Passed in 2002 as a part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which sought to cut back company malfeasance, the obstruction provision was initially meant to ban actions like shredding paperwork or tampering with witnesses in congressional inquiries.
Several protection legal professionals — amongst them Mr. Reffitt’s — tried to get the cost dismissed, arguing that prosecutors had stretched it far past its scope and had been making an attempt to criminalize habits that too intently resembled odd protest protected by the First Amendment.
But 10 federal judges — together with Dabney L. Friedrich, who’s overseeing Mr. Reffitt’s case — disagreed and allowed the cost for use. The Reffitt trial would be the first time a jury will get to determine whether or not the cost suits the crime, although in an uncommon transfer, Judge Friedrich has stated she’s going to strike the depend earlier than it goes to the jury if the federal government fails to show its case.
Beyond such technical issues, the trial will function what quantities to a panoramic view of the violence on the Capitol.
Prosecutors have stated, for instance, that they intend to show their declare {that a} “civil disorder” occurred that day by exhibiting the jury “the progression of the riot” by means of a compilation of surveillance movies from each inside and outside the constructing. The jury can be anticipated to see parts of a 31-minute video that Mr. Reffitt recorded throughout the riot in addition to a clip of Vice President Mike Pence hurrying down a staircase after attackers breached the constructing.
Three Capitol Police officers are set to testify about their firsthand makes an attempt to cease Mr. Reffitt — and others — from breaking previous safety by firing pepper balls and spraying tear fuel on the crowd. One of these officers, Shauni Kerkhoff, is scheduled to be the primary witness on the trial, prosecutors have stated.
Mr. Reffitt’s lawyer, William L. Welch III, has not stated a lot in regards to the protection he intends to mount, however his consumer has brazenly pushed again in opposition to accusations that he took half in something untoward on the Capitol. In a letter obtained by ProPublica final spring, Mr. Reffitt wrote of the assault, “There was no insurrection, no conspiracy, no sinister plan and no reason to think otherwise.”
On Thursday, a message purportedly written by Mr. Reffitt was posted on the “J6 Patriot News” channel on Telegram, discussing the “beginning of the 1/6 Political Prisoner Trials.”
Capitol Riot’s Aftermath: Key Developments
The first trial. Guy Wesley Reffitt, who’s accused of obstructing the work of Congress on Jan. 6, is ready to change into the primary defendant to face trial in a case stemming from the Capitol riot. The trial, which opens on Feb. 28, will set the tone for dozens of different circumstances.
“I am prepared to stare down the barrel of tyranny to receive the bullet of freedom,” the message stated.
The case is considered one of a number of that may function proof in regards to the U.S. militia motion. Prosecutors say that Mr. Reffitt was a member of the Texas Three Percenters, considered one of a number of state chapters of a bigger group that focuses on gun rights and antigovernment exercise.
While the Three Percenters will not be as distinguished as different far-right teams just like the Proud Boys or the Oath Keepers, a number of purported members of the motion have been charged in reference to the Capitol assault, together with at the very least 4 from Southern California.
To show Mr. Reffitt’s militia ties, prosecutors are set to name as a witness a fellow Three Percenter who plans to testify underneath an immunity cope with the federal government. They say the witness — identified for now solely by the initials R.H. — intends to inform the jury in regards to the preparations he made with Mr. Reffitt to journey to Washington and the firearms and tactical gear, together with an assault rifle, that Mr. Reffitt introduced on the journey.
Two members of Mr. Reffitt’s household — his son and daughter — are additionally anticipated to take the stand in opposition to him.
Prosecutors say the son, who was 18 on the time of the assault, will inform the jury that he and his sister, then 16, spoke with their father when he returned from Washington after the riot and that Mr. Reffitt threatened to shoot them in the event that they went to the F.B.I. about him.
In a earlier courtroom listening to, the daughter testified that Mr. Reffitt threatened to place a bullet in her cellphone if she posted about him on social media.